Showing posts with label Dennis Markuze aka David Mabus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dennis Markuze aka David Mabus. Show all posts

Thursday, August 11, 2011

Dennis Markuze aka David Mabus in the news again

Everyone's favorite death threat dealing, stalking, psychotic nutjob has been in the news again.

It all started when long time target of Markuze aka David Mabus threats posted the blog entry Time to institutionalize Dennis Markuze. In it he noted:

Every morning when I get up and get on the computer, the first thing I do is delete the pile of spam from Dennis Markuze, each of which is usually cross-posted to 50 to 100 other people. Every time I fire up Twitter, the first thing I do is clear the garbage Dennis Markuze has left there; yesterday I blocked and reported spam from over 25 Markuze accounts, amounting to several hundred messages.

You know what? This is wrong. I shouldn't have to do this. Over the years — I've been getting these threats from Markuze since 1993 — it's gradually grown from an occasional deranged message on usenet to part of my daily routine, where I'm dealing with hundreds of ranty messages every day from one disturbed individual in Montreal, Canada. And I'm not even his sole target: he has a hate-on for Shermer, Randi, and Dawkins, and this is all he does with his life: he sits in his bedroom in his parent's house and sends out shrill, incoherent messages to the world, all day long.


In the body of the post, PZ linked to a petition demanding that the Montreal city police take the "Mabus" death threats seriously. What the survey didn't disclose was that every signature generated an e-mail to the Montreal police. After a few thousand signatures were added to the petition they plaintively tweeted:

@SPVM Police Montréal
@rebeccawatson Please stop sendind e-mails to our media adresse by signinig the petition.We are investigating the case. Thank you.


The next day the Montreal Gazette ran the article Montreal police start probe of Twitter threats. Predictably the Montreal Police come off looking like idiots. Some people are claiming to have never heard of Mabus, others are claiming there's an ongoing investigation. It all comes across as a lazy, incompetent force trying to circle the wagons and pretend to be doing something.

Then there's the conspiracy theory that Markuze / Mabus is a Deep Cover Liberal and the Montreal Police are in on it.

During all of this Twitter users have been asked to retweet screen captures of any threats that Mabus makes to @SPVM so the Montreal Police get a copy of the tweets before Twitter deletes the latest account used by this nutjob.

Markuze / Mabus is crazy, no bones about it. He's been stalking people and making death threats for a while, and it's only a matter of time before he hurts someone. Even psychics think Dennis Markuze aka David Mabus is a threat to the life of PZ.

I wonder if the Montreal police ever use psychics.

Thursday, January 20, 2011

Criticizing what he doesn't understand

Most sensible people will at least do a little research into a topic before they offer their opinion on it in writing. Mormon blogger William Monahan however is not burdened by the need for pesky things like facts and accurate information and instead chooses to dive in head first, armed only with vague notions and shoddy straw-man images of what he's attacking. The result reads more like a parody of conservative Mormonism than anything else. Let's take a look at Mr. Monahan's mental meanderings for a good laugh.

Please note, the use of text from his writing constitutes fair use under US law.

A world crazy for magic and divination will ultimately reject the majesty of the divine.

Tell that to devotees of Catholic Mystics.
While loveable vampires, werewolves and the Harry Potter craze may be titillating broomstick fiction, their supernatural romps are anything but super.


There is a reason for the exploding popularity of 1-800-PSYCHICS and the invasion of ghouls, magic and wizards. Predictably, the natural man substitutes the mystical for his Maker, growing fat on his own self-pleasing conceit. Thus conceited, he is free to cannibalize fantasy for faith.

The main problem with this bold assertion is that is presumes that people who are turning to Twilight and Harry Potter for entertainment are necessarily turning away from God in the process. Unless Monahan offers some actual evidence that this is the case, he might as well be attacking NASCAR or random prime time television programs for luring people away from God. The mere fact that a particular form of entertainment does not explicitly glorify God does not mean it is drawing you away from God.

Dungeons and Dragons


Some years ago I set apart a young man for full-time missionary service. Within two days of his arrival at the Missionary Training Center, he had to be sent home. He was suffering withdrawal symptoms from an addiction to "Dungeons and Dragons," a popular video game. Because he was engrossed in levels of magic, he was unable to level his focus on the magic of his mission.

I call bullshit on this claim. For starters calling Dungeons and Dragons (D&D) a video game makes it clear Monahan doesn't even know what D&D is. I'll give Monahan the benefit of the doubt and assume he's talking about a computer game that's either based upon D&D or is at least somewhat wizard and orc related, as opposed to something sci-fi related. Second, what kind of "withdrawal" is he talking about?

The "levels of magic" line is an early clue to just how poorly Monahan understands what he's attacking. It's the first indication that he doesn't understand the difference between fantasy and reality. He does not appear to realize that people who play Dungeons and Dragons aren't actually learning magic spells. They aren't actually summoning demons and the books about the game do not give directions on how to do either. This fundamental misunderstanding will be reinforced in the rest of his essay.

Sadly, some fans of the dark arts get sucked into the occult. They confuse mysticism with miracle, and spiritualism with spirituality. Perhaps their days would be better spent searching the scriptures than groping cobwebbed halls and creaky staircases.

Ahh, here we see the problem. Monahan is one of this ignorant idiots who, knowing nothing about role playing games other than what his pastor told him, is convinced that playing D&D means you learn actual magic spells. He's equating computer games with trying to learn magic. This is a bit like claiming all churches crucify a parishioner at Good Friday services, or that the NBA beheads the coach of the losing team, just like the Aztec game that inspired Basketball.

The next section of his ramblings, "The evolution of horror and the occult" is nothing more than a list of a few horror movies. Aside from a few template claims like "Taro readings were common and Ouija boards dotted the teenage party scene" there isn't much of interest there.

When the seedy creeps from the shadows


What was once reserved for drunken sailors and seedy dives is now mainstream
Wait, is he about to diverge from attacking D&D to claim public intoxication and syphilis riddled whores are now mainstream?

Sadly, no, but such a claim would make more sense than the rest of his essay.
Like all things seedy, vampires and wizards operate best from the shadows. They are repelled by the sunlight. Perhaps that is why millions of fans line up at the box office at midnight. Enough of vampires.

Does this guy think vampires are real? He seems to think D&D players are learning real magic. Does he think vampires are real too?

Where are the dentists? It's common sense: no pointy eyeteeth, no blood sucking forays into innocent necks.

That was random. I'm sure it made sense in his wee little head. Seriously, what point is he trying to make with that line?

And wizards? I'd rather fight evil with the character of Christ than a novelist's flawed characters.

Of course a novelist's characters are flawed. Perfect characters who never make mistakes are BORING to read about. Monahan seems to have real trouble separating entertainment from reality. D&D players are not ACTUALLY trying to fight demons. "Lord of the Rings" fans are not ACTUALLY trying to smuggle gold rings into volcanoes with the aid of wizards who have a tendency to die and come back with cooler clothing.
Pop culture is on the move


Pop culture is always on the move, but the motion sickness can make even the elect of God queasy. Just because something gyrates for attention doesn't mean we should pay attention.

Clearly, Monahan is not a Lady GaGa fan.

All kidding aside, this is more an issue of a youth oriented culture than anything demonic or occult. The youth oriented culture tends to annoy most people over the age of 35, but trying to cast that cultural flaw as an epic battle between good and evil is misleading. It's also idiotic and will do nothing to resolve the problem.

The net result of a world thirsting to mainstream the seedy is an unquenchable thirst for more, thus parching the seeds of faith.

Here we see that Monahan is apparently ignorant of Biblical text. After Jonah was vomited up by the sea creature that swallowed him, he went on to, against his will, minster to what was allegedly one of the most evil cities around. You know what they did? They repented. If Monahan was any kind of an evangelist he'd see a culture awash in pleasures of the flesh as a fertile ground. If worldly pleasures really are as spiritually empty as Monahan is likely to have been taught, then the current culture is one ripe for God's word. In a world of drowning people, Monahan is complaining that people need life preservers while sitting on a stack of them.

This guy appears to be more interested in complaining about there being un-Mormon entertainment in the world than doing anything to try and save souls. I have a quick tip for Monahan, spewing a bunch of nonsense that misrepresents the people you're trying to save is NOT going to win anyone over, it just makes you look like an ignorant, hypocritical ass.

The prophets warn


For centuries the prophets have warned us against magic, divination and the occult. "There shall not be found among you any that ... useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch ... or a wizard, or a necromancer. For all that do these things are an abomination unto the Lord. ..." (Duet.18:10-12)

If Dungeons and Dragons players or horror movie fans were actually trying to cast spells or summon demons that verse might have been relevant. All Monahan has managed to do here is alienate anyone who actually HAS played Dungeons and Dragons. They know from personal experience that Monahan's essay is nonsense.

The sad byproduct of a world entranced by magic, vampires and ghosts is the more we assault the senses, the less sensitive we become to holy sensations.


Fans of the genre cannot escape God's warnings by claiming vicarious thrills in fiction.

They can however dismiss Monahan, as he does not appear to understand the difference between reading a fiction book about witches and deciding to gut a cat and try to read it's entrails to see who will win the next Superbowl. Watching "The Witches of Eastwick" is not the start of a slippery slope that will lead to you getting knocked up by a demon. Most people can tell the difference between entertainment and reality. Those who cannot have mental disorders that need to be treated.

Warning to parents


Parents who wink at mystical fantasy as "innocent fun" may be closing a blind eye to the not so innocent. There is something irresistible to our youth about escaping reality, and when they do, fantasy can become their unintended jailer.

Citation needed. I want to see the psychology research that shows playing Dungeons and Dragons leads to people rejecting the religion with which they were raised. I want some actual data and not the ramblings of a man who can't be bothered to differentiate between watching a horror movie and summoning a demon.

By guiding our children’s interests to an abiding interest in the divine, they avoid the shadows where bad things happen.

Ahh, the "Bury their head in the sand" guide to parenting. Instead of raising kids who can deal with the real world, they raise kids who are often shattered when they venture beyond the safe borders of the social playpen their parents construct.

I'm sorry, but I want my son to be able to deal with the real world, not hide from it.

Mysticism is not miracle, and howling for the undead is not a prayer for life eternal.
Again, we see that Monahan can't tell the difference between entertainment and active participation in the occult. His inability to differentiate between fantasy and reality is troubling.

While we can't protect our youth from every devious thing the world offers, we can offer the armor of God in the safety of a gospel-centered home.

Here we are near the end of Monahan's drivel an he has yet to actually give people a reason to see D&D as a threat, other than his inability to separate fantasy from reality.

The power of prayer, the sacrifice of service, the iron will of the iron rod: These are things that produce faith leading to Jesus.


These things are not magic, but their transforming effect is truly magical

I know plenty of Christian and Jewish people who play Dungeons and Dragons. It has not hurt their faith that I can see. Of course, unlike Monahan, they're capable of separating reality from fantasy.
William Monahan is a 1980 graduate of BYU Law School. He practices law in Gilbert, Ariz. A former Phoenix stake president, he serves on the high council for the Queen Creek Chandler Heights Stake.

That's right, this drivel was brought to us by a graduate of the The Brigham Young University Law School. It looks like Monahan has lived in a Mormon cocoon for his entire life. You'd think a lawyer would want to actually learn something about what he's attacking before he attacks it. I hope whatever Monahan does with his law degree involves more competent research than his babbling about religion.

Monday, August 23, 2010

A wise quote

"Being yelled at by a furious woman should be treated as a semi-formal occasion" -Dexter (The serial killer)

Update:

I find it hilarious that Dennis Markuze aka David Mabus felt compelled to post a comment, adding his usual incoherent ranting and drivel to a quote about furious women. Perhaps David is trying to tell us he's working on becoming Danielle.

I'm also amused by his reference to skeptic and magician James Randi coming out of the closet. It's ooooold news, but then no one could accuse Danielle / David Mabus of being timely or well informed. If Danielle is true to form, the videos probably won't even be related to the point this poor unmedicated schizophrenic is trying to make. IF the videos are related, they'll probably contradict Mr/Ms Mabus.

Friday, April 30, 2010

Dennis Markuze aka David Mabus Babbles Again

I've asked Dennis Markuze aka David Mabus to restrict his incoherent diatribes to threads that are actually about him. Instead he chooses to comment on almost every post I make. This wouldn't be a problem if he were actually responding to the content of my posts. Instead he spews the same kind of irrational nonsense that gets him banned from just about every online forum he touches. Since I don't want every post in my blog to become a long list of his bigoted copypasta I've been forced to delete his comments when made outside of the threads dedicated to his special, unhinged brand of insanity.

His latest spew however includes some new material. He's changed things up a bit and I thought I'd give him some recognition for the 15 minutes or so of work he must have put into it.

DM has left a new comment on your post "Speaking in Tongues":
they thought BOOBIES had no effect... WRONG!


see, I just want to make it clear to the rest of you:




jen is unable to see that there is a CONFLICT BETWEEN EROS & SCIENCE....


________________


http://www.blaghag.com/2010/04/in-name-of-science-i-offer-my-boobs.html


ETA: follow-up


http://www.blaghag.com/2010/04/quick-clarification-about-boobquake.html


see how we take a term and convert it into its AUTHENTIC POLITICAL DIMENSION - THAT
OF LIBERATION - not just merely harmless expression...


they thought BOOBIES had no effect... WRONG!
____________
Here DM again fails to make any kind of point. I recommend checking out the links above, as they're a humorous response to a misogynistic Iranian cleric who claimed that indecently dressed women caused Earthquakes. DM appears to agree with the cleric, but fails to articulate any kind of a defense of his position. He also completely fails to make any kind of counter-argument against the female blogger above. He links to two posts that ridicule the woman hating cleric and then gives a grade school "nuh-uh!" style response.

It's tempting to suspect that DM is in fact a deep cover atheist and that his posts are meant not to attack atheism but to ridicule religious beliefs. He comes across as a ham fisted, inarticulate attempt at a religion focused Stephen Colbert impression.
FOR THE *HEADLESS IDIOT* called m.shermer

http://www.skeptic.com/Merchant2/graphics/audio_video/av558_lg.jpg

Again, we have a poorly thought out insult coupled with a link to someone who disagrees with DM's alleged religious beliefs. No attempt is made and saying WHY DM disagrees with this new target. DM merely asserts his disdain for Dr. Shermer and acts as if his disdain were in and of itself relevant and sufficient.

his is your *FINAL WARNING*
____________________________________
the really SHARP END OF OCCAM’S RAZOR…


they mix SKEPTICISM with ATHEISM…


KABOOM…
DM has used this text before. It's just recycled DM copypasta.

Now I want you to listen to this little f*cker...


http://www.ted.com/talks/james_randi.html
This too makes me suspect DM is really a deep cover atheist trying to ridicule religion. He tosses a profanity at James Randi but then cedes the rest of the discussion to James Randi.  If he actually disagreed with what Randi had to say, he's try to construct some kind of a response to the linked video. If the two of them were having a formal debate this would amount to DM's entire response consisting of "My opponent is a f**er, I will now allow him to use both his allotted time and mine to make whatever points he wants." Can you imagine a political candidates' debate running in such a manner?
Randi:



When I see your UGLY FACE I understand why you are an atheist
_________________________________
Even though DM has used this text before, I still don't know what he's trying to claim. My best guess is that he finds James Randi unattractive and thinks that's why Randi is an atheist.

now I want you to watch this video of DELUSION...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SW2zsobxJDU
Again, DM lobs and insult and then cedes the rest of the discussion to the opposition. The linked video features a commercial pointing out that most people are responsible, honest members of society not because they fear a cosmic daddy will spank them if they misbehave, but because it's the right thing to do. The video itself makes the point much better than I do and I recommend watching it.

with the atheists:


they start begging when they start dying...
More of the same old same old from DM. He seems to have a fevered vision in his mind of atheists fervently praying to God and begging forgiveness when death approaches. This is part of the same mentality that leads some people to claim that atheists don't actually lack belief in a deity, but are merely angry at God and are denying him out of spite. It's as insulting and dismissive an attitude as using Fred Phelps as an example of the average Christian or judging all Muslims by the 9/11 suicide bombers. It's replacing any attempt at or desire for understanding with a convenient stereotype.
_____________________


Atheists,


but you have NO ANSWER TO DEATH... therefore you FAIL...


the Death of Ath*ism


*********************************
What does DM mean by an "answer" to death? Most the atheists I've spoken to about death seem to agree that a cessation of consciousness accompanies physical death and that oblivion follows. That hardly amounts to "NO ANSWER TO DEATH."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-8-Yxdphsg


DEATH TRAP


**********************************
Again, DM is acting more like a deep cover atheist than someone with actual religious convictions. The linked video above features psychic Deepak Chopra as one of the defenders of religion. Deepak Chopra was the new age twit who "jokingly" blamed his own meditation for a 2010 earthquake in Baja. Now, if I were trying to mock and ridicule religion, I'd probably want people to equate a belief in God with a blithering idiot like Deepak Chopra.

THE REAL QUESTION:


DOES ATHEISM HAVE A FUTURE?


AND THE ANSWER - NO!


Atheists,


GET OUT OF MY UNIVERSE
If DM actually believed in God, he;s know it's God's universe, not his.
you little liars do nothing but antagonize…
The phrase "pot calling the kettle black" comes to mind. Keep in mind, DM posted this in response to a post I made about speaking in tongues. In that post I threat the "Acts of the Apostles" as accurate and the description of the Pentecost miracle of "Speaking in Tongues" as authentic. This was the context that DM felt appropriate for a hate filled rant against atheism. He was the one who introduced atheism to the thread and yet here we see they hypocrite yammering on about atheists antagonizing other people.

What, exactly, does DM think HIS posts are? They're certainly not reasoned debate.
and you try to eliminate all the dreams and hopes of humanity…
Clearly DM has not watched Carl Sagan's "Cosmos." Some of the most hopeful writing I've encountered about human destiny came from atheists. For some reason believing we have to do things for ourselves motivates some people. Instead of relying upon God to do everything for us, they go out and pursue the advancement of humanity with their own actions. I want DM to elaborate on what "dreams" he feels atheists have attacked and what they said or did to attack them.
but you LOST…


THE DEATH OF ATH*ISM - SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD


Crystal Night, Atheists!
Here DM is evoking Kristallnacht, the night NAZI agitators destroyed the businesses and properties of Austrian Jews as a preface to moving them into ghettos and then concentration camps. That's right folks, DM appears to be advocating Christians round up and execute atheists. I'm sure he'd have been right at home during the Spanish inquisition.

Oh, wait, DM claims to believe in the prophesies of Nostradamus. That would have gotten him tortured to death during the Spanish Inquisition.
FINALE:



Have I said this before?
Oh yes, may times. Originality is not DM's forte.

***********************************


http://theatheistwars.free0host.com/


***********************************
PULLING THE PLUG on atheism


http://www.firstscience.com/site/articles/coles.asp
Predictably, the link doesn't actually say anything that supports DM's claims.
bye
Yeah, right.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20090126/as-indonesia-solar-eclipse/images/c52d9d50-7ca2-4c3a-b13c-c866836298c8.jpg




Einstein puts the final nail in the coffin of atheism…


*************************************
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7vpw4AH8QQ
*************************************
Here we get into familiar territory. DM links to a video that does NOTHING to support any of the nebulous claims he's made. Either he lacks the mental capacity to understand this, or he's continuing his program of mocking religion.
atheists deny their own life element…
LIGHT OR DEATH, ATHEISTS?
********************************
***************************LIGHT*********
************************************
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CC7Sg41Bp-U
E=MC2
Again, DM links to another video that has nothing to do with his claims.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmtK-X_MV0k&feature=fvw
DOWN THE TOILET!!!
Here we have DM linking to a video by Ray Comfort, a man so incapable of honesty and integrity that Comfort claims food plants that have been heavily bred by humans are "proof" of Creationism because they're so well suited to human use. So far, this video of Ray Comfort's claims about the religious beliefs of Albert Einstein is the closest DM has come to actually supporting any of the anti-atheist rants he's posted.
http://open.salon.com/blog/sandra_no_longer_miller/2009/02/13/files/lamb1234553042.jpg

LAMB POWER!
You know, wool undergarments would explain a good deal about DM's sour, cranky disposition.
_____________________


UNDERSTAND!!!?
What I understand is that Dennis Markuze aka David Mabusis either incapable of rational thought and in desperate need of psychiatric care, or is in fact a deep cover atheist out to mock Christians and drive people away from religion by slandering it with his rants.
Shermer - Randi - Myers - Harris - Dawkins VS. NOSTRADAMUS - EINSTEIN - MARKUZE
you are ANNIHILATED!!!
crystal night is a reference to when the SUN IS ECLIPSED... --------------------------------------
Repent and turn to God or be destroyed...
LIGHT OR DEATH, ATHEISTS?




********************************
***************************LIGHT*********
************************************ or death...


LIGHT!
As you can see the rest of his post dissolves into the same kind of disconnected ranting he normally engages in. This latest MD post has convinced me that DM is not the psychologically damaged, mentally challenged psychopath he pretends to be, but is expressing an actual hatred of religion by actively mocking it. Not even a psychologically crazed moron could think any of his posts are actually convincing people or even defending his positions. What they are doing however is making people with religious beliefs look like clinically retarded idiots incapable of coherent thought. DM's rants embody everything the most hostile atheists decry about religion. He embodies the anger, resentment and violent undercurrent that lead to atrocities like the Crusades and the Spanish Inquisition.

In my opinion, Dennis Markuze aka David Mabus is too perfect a parody of religion to be anything but an act.

Thursday, April 29, 2010

Speaking in Tongues

I've been having an online discussion with a man who claims that "Speaking in Tongues" involves speaking in an angelic, divine or invented language without understanding anything you're saying. I've countered that the Biblical examples of Speaking in Tongues, such as when the apostles spoke in tongues on Pentecost, involved speaking a language despite having never been taught it, but understanding what was being said. He countered by asking, "why bother to mentioned if it is just understandable language?"

I responded by pointing out they were speaking in a language they had not learned, but was a real language. one has to remember that 1st century Palestine was a melting pot of cultures, but not everyone understood each other. Traveling more than a few days or weeks away would require you to find a translator. Traveling more than a few months would mean it would be nearly miraculous to even FIND someone who spoke both your language and the native language. Even traveling within the Roman Empire and knowing Latin would only let you speak to the educated, not the masses.

Remember the Tower of Babel? When the apostles spoke in tongues on Pentecost they were undoing that curse.

The ease with which one can find a translator these days and the mind boggling scope of a few spoken languages makes it easy to discount the amazing power of the Pentecost miracle of speaking in tongues. I can understand why false prophets try and claim the gift involves speaking in an angelic language despite the complete lack of Biblical support for the claim. When you can enroll at the local university and learn just about any language you want it's easy to forget just how incredible the gift of tongues, speaking to people in their own language despite having never been taught it, really is.

They didn't HAVE university courses in other languages back then. You couldn't go to Borders, pick up a "Spanish 101" DVD series and have a rudimentary understanding of the language in a few months. You needed to either travel to a place and immerse yourself for months to years, or hire one or more tutors. Most people only spoke the languages of their immediate neighbors. Only the wealthy and traders could afford to learn more languages than they grew up with.

And here were these fishermen, these uneducated working class stiffs running around speaking the language of the people who had traveled for weeks or months to be in Jerusalem for passover. The travelers would have been blown away by this. Here they were, needing translators or speaking a pidgin Latin or Hebrew, desperately trying to communicate even the most rudimentary ideas, suddenly being approached by a fisherman who spoke their language with the fluency of a native speaker yet were obviously working class men from the immediate area.

The miracle looses all substance if the Apostles didn't understand what they were saying. Instead of being miraculously connected to visiting foreigners they'd be nothing but a marionette. The visitors would have seen uneducated nobodies reciting a memorized speech. That's not a miracle. That's no better than rote memorization.

Thursday, April 22, 2010

How crazy is he?

David Mabus was banned by the David Icke forums.

That's right, his rantings were so repetitive and unsupported that he was banned from a forum dedicated to a man who believes alien reptilian monsters are secretly ruling the Earth. Considering the "V" miniseries to be a public service announcement is less crazy than David Mabus.

Monday, April 19, 2010

MSNBC's Rachel Maddow - Gov. Huckabee's foot-in-mouth on Gay issues - ex...



I've gotta say, Mike here is looking more and more like a closet case to me. The fact that he's compared homosexuality to drug use makes me suspect he's suppressing some "jonesing" of his own.

It's only a matter of time before he's outed. You don't equate homosexuality with drug addition unless you yourself are fighting some serious man-love urges. The quivering, butterfly-stomached way he touches the issue of homosexuality screams "denial" with a salivating, unctuous urgency of the kind only heard from within the confines of a Caligula themed, San Francisco bath house.

That's my suspicion anyway.

Friday, April 2, 2010

Dennis Markuze aka David Mabus found my blog

I was never really into the whole "Ego surfing" thing. I'm not going to claim humility or a lack of narcissism has anything to do with it. The simple fact is there are plenty of men named "Matthew Miller" who are more famous than I am, so I'd have to slog though a lot of data about other people before I found much about me.

Dennis Markuze aka David Mabus on the other hand has no such problem. His name is rather distinct so it's not hard to track down references to the name online. It also looks like Dennis / David found my recent blog post about him. He posted a response, which I'll discuss below. Oddly he also posted similar replies to three other posts of the last few weeks, none of which had anything to do with him. I guess he wanted to make sure I noticed him.

Anyway, on to amateur the analysis of the crazy:
THE DEATH OF ATH*ISM - SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD

David is off to a bad start. The all caps typing is generally considered poor form online. It implies the writer is shouting. The inexplicable * in "atheism" is a clear indication that DM thinks it's a naughty word deserving of censorship, which is just plan silly.
http://engforum.pravda.ru/showthread.php?t=280780

This is a link to a discussion forum where Dennis Markuze aka David Mabus posted a few bits of flotsam, but never made any actual statements or arguments. It's sadly typical of the Markuze posts I've seen online. He seems to think making unsupported statements and linking to unrelated videos constitutes evidence of some kind.
Einstein puts the final nail in the coffin of atheism...

*************************************

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7vpw4AH8QQ

*************************************
The youtube video talks about Einstein's theory of relativity in relation to theoretical time travel. It doesn't offer any evidence or claims about the existence or non-existence of God. Aside from mentioning Einstein it is wholly and completely unrelated to his claim of Einstein putting "the final nail in the coffin of atheism". Markuze's "logic" if I can use the word, seems to be to make a wild claim about Einstein and then support his claim by screaming "See! This video mentions Einstein so that PROVES I'm right!" It would be a bit like claiming Glenn Beck raped and murdered a girl in 1990 and then linking to a video of Beck talking about the health care bill as "evidence" to support the claim.
atheists deny their own life element...

Again, Markuze makes a statement but does nothing to support it. WHAT life element are atheists supposedly denying? What does Markuze even mean by "element"?
LIGHT OR DEATH, ATHEISTS?

********************************
***************************LIGHT*********
************************************

___________

Demonstrating he's at least consistent, Markuze makes no sense here. I see no indication of any kind of an attempt to prove a point or argue a particular viewpoint. All Markuze has offered in the above is a string of inarticulate ranting. There's no cohesion, no attempt to state a point and then defend it, nothing. If posts like the ones he made to this blog are a window into his actual thought processes, then it looks like there isn't much there except irrational, broiling antagonism.
add comment moderation to your blasphemy blog, you fool...

Why bother? This is a low traffic blog and most of the people who have posted comments here made actual contributions to the discussions or were at least relevant. There's already a spam filter. Markuze posting his rant in three unrelated posts is the worst I've had in well over a year.

Now, Markuze might very well decide to start spamming this blog with his nonsense. If he restricts his posts to the threads about him and tries to rationally and calmly defend his position, then I welcome his input. If all he does is post the same copypasta to one thread after another then I'll have to turn on comment moderation until he grows bored with me and moves on to the next person who dares mention him online.

And what, pray tell, is so blasphemous about my blog anyway?

Mr Markuze, you have a very poor reputation online. I want to give you the chance to demonstrate a level of rational thought and coherent discussion your critics seem to think beyond your capabilities.

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

How I caused a panic 6 months after April 1

Back when I was working at FinancialCampus, I circulated a memo on
April Fool's Day, 2002. The memo got a few giggles but was largely
ignored, as most my coworkers didn't get the joke.

In the next five months the company had a major growth spurt. An
entire department sprung into existence with close to a dozen people.

One day I returned to the office after giving a deposition. (The
company was being sued, again) and I was approached by an
exceptionally foolish woman who had, for reasons known only to her,
been going though my home directory on the server. Why she even had
access to my home directory the Network Admin refused to tell me, but
the damage was done. She'd found my memo and printed it up,
circulating it among her coworkers. The entire department was in a
panic, as the only person in that department who'd been with the company when I'd first
circulated the memo had clearly forgotten all about it.

She ran up to me and demanded to know why I hadn't told anyone about
the "poison in the water." I was confused until she showed me a printout
of the memo. I read it and started laughing. This upset her and some
of the people behind her. "This could be killing our kids" one of them
said.

I asked her where she'd gotten the memo and she admitted to having
spent the day poking around peoples' home directories on the server. I
pointed out the date.

"So?" she demanded.

"I sent it around on April 1."

One of her coworkers swore quietly and returned to her desk. A few
others groaned and did the same.

"So we've been drinking this s**t for months?"

It took an additional 20 minutes to get her to understand it was an
April Fool's joke and that dihydrogen monoxide was water.

Below is the text of the memo:

The Massachusetts Water supply has been found to contain dihydrogen monoxide.

This acid can cause corrosion in a variety of substances, irreversibly
damaging wood, paint, metal and most structural components.

Prolonged human exposure can cause loss of skin oils, discomfort,
encourage bacterial infection and in some extreme cases, death.

In pure form, it is clear, odorless and tasteless.

Numerous organisms, many harmful to humans, thrive on this chemical.

This chemical also damages electrical components and destroys paper products.

Thousands of deaths a year can be attributed both directly and
indirectly to dihydrogen monoxide. One recent, and spectacular death,
involved an unfortunate man who handled electrical components that had
come into contact with dihydrogen monoxide. While electrocution was
the direct cause of death, the electrical device would have posed no
threat if the dihydrogen monoxide had not destroyed the device's
insulation.

Presence of dihydrogen monoxide in the lungs prevents the absorption
of Oxygen, and results in death.

There has even been one case reported where excessive quantities of
dihydrogen monoxide caused electrolytes to be flushed from the body,
resulting in death. This however, appears to be a suicide.

Dihydrogen monoxide intake can be correlated with an increased need to
urinate as the chemical is flushed from the body.

Recent studies have revealed that most Americans have large deposits
of dihydrogen monoxide in their bodies.

Withdrawal from dihydrogen monoxide intake is generally fatal.

It's production and distribution is legal and unregulated aside from
rudimentary purity laws.

Please take the appropriate precautions.

When will Erick Erickson be outed?

I've long suspected that the most outspoken, angry and paranoid anti-gay activists are closeted homosexuals. In my estimation their hate fueled diatribes are not expressions of moral certainly or religious zeal, but the burbling emissions of a deep seated self loathing. There's research linking homophobia to homosexual arousal. The cases of men like Ted Haggard only add real life examples to fuel the theory.

Based on this information, I'd like to suggest that Erick Erickson might be gay. Erick Erickson's anti-gay vitriol leaves little doubt about his homophobia. For example, Erickson compared hiring a homosexual to supporting NAMBLA in one essay. In that essay he gave the impression that he sees no difference between homosexuality and pedophilia. Kevin Jennings was not the only person to face the business end of Erickson's rhetoric . Obama and Ted Kennedy are among the folks who have been on the business end of his ire.

It's his anti-gay statements that interest me most. His inability distinguish between homosexuality and pedophilia for example is the sort of thing I've come to expect from political nutjobs being eaten alive by their own desire for a wild night with Ricky Martin.

The question then becomes, how long will it be before someone outs him? How long before a past lover comes forward to reveal steamy, seedy secrets about late night bath house encounters? Will some staffer at CNN discover a gay porn stash on Erickson's PC? More importantly, are there any offshore gambling sites that will let me set up a pool on when Erickson will be outed?

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Help! Help! I'm being oppressed!

Woman claims she's being oppressed because she's being treated the same as everyone else.

Shirley Chaplin doesn't look like a religious nutjob. She's a nurse who worked at a hospital that banned all necklaces for safety reasons. The elderly patients she cared for have a tendency to grab things when being moved or treated and a necklace is a nice shiny object that poses the exact kind of safety hazard the hospital wants to minimize.

Ms. Chaplin however, disagrees. You see, her necklace has a gold cross. Even though someone wearing an Islamic Crescent, a Star of David, a Wicca Pentagram or a Flying Spaghetti Monster would all be asked to remove their necklaces in the workplace, Shirley Chaplin's cross is special. She considers it persecution that she's being held to the exact same standards as everyone else.

The hospital makes concessions for religious clothing, like head scarves, but not for jewelry. Being the whiny, self centered twit that she is, Ms Chaplin has gotten her clergy involved. The clergy in turn has decided to claim that this safety rule is an example of religious persecution.

Who is it asking for special rights again?

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Dennis Markuze aka David Mabus

There's a man online known as David Mabus. He's a bit of a nutter. While no one has ever really discerned what he's trying to say with his posts, the best guess at his meaning is that Nostradamus predicted Depeche Mode and through them the 9/11 terror attacks. This somehow (he's never elaborated that I can see) entitles him to the 1 million USD James Randi education foundation prize.

I was curious what he was up to these days, so I went spelunking online. I found this response to his rantings that I personally think is the best, most appropriate reply that could ever be given to David Mabus. I encourage anyone who encounters him online to use it:

Source:
http://www.atheistfoundation.org.au/forums/showthread.php?p=8644

Dennis Markuze aka David Mabus - former computer salesman - Montreal, Canada.

please seek advice.

http://www.montrealtherapy.com/
1-800-THERAPIST network

Montreal Psychology Office
Obtain help for depression, anxiety, smoking cessation, relationship issues, and more...
http://www.psymontreal.com

If you are more comfortable in a French speaking environment
Luc Blain, psychologue clinicien
La vie est une succession d'Ă©vĂ©nements qui amènent l'individu Ă  les subir, Ă  les nier, ou encore Ă  les transformer pour les rendre digestes psychiquement. Dans le processus de transformation, la personne retrouve une plus grande libertĂ© intĂ©rieure dans diffĂ©rentes dimensions de sa vie: capacitĂ© d'avoir du plaisir, d'aimer et d'Ăªtre aimĂ©, de s'Ă©panouir dans un travail ou des activitĂ©s.
http://www.lucblain.ca

Picked up off the net, but you may need reminding.